Re: Is postgresql ca do the job for software deployed in ASP - Mailing list pgsql-performance
From | David Gagnon |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Is postgresql ca do the job for software deployed in ASP |
Date | |
Msg-id | 44AA6E20.60205@siunik.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Is postgresql ca do the job for software deployed in ASP ou SaaS mode? ("Mikael Carneholm" <Mikael.Carneholm@WirelessCar.com>) |
List | pgsql-performance |
Mikael Carneholm wrote: >> For my application there is very little info I can share. Maybe less >> > than 10 on 100 actually so I not sure it worth it ... > > Ok, so 90% of the tables are being written to - this either means that > your application uses very little constants, or that it has access to > constans that are stored somewhere else (eg, a JMX Mbean that's > initialized from property files on application startup). Would it be too > much work to redesign the DB model to support more than one client? > Yes configuration are in property files or somewhere else. I will keep this solution in mind but for now I really think that would really complicated for what it will give in return... > >> I look into the HP DL385 and DL585 on HP site and they are price >> > between > >> 3000 and 15000$$ (base price). Thats quite a difference? So is the HP >> > > >> DL385 with 2 cpus will do the job ? >> > > Yeah, there's quite a difference on the price tags between those two. > I'd vote for the DL385 since the sockets for the two extra CPU's won't > give you linear scalability per $ in the end. A single machine may be > cheaper to administrate, but if administration costs are > irrelevant/negligible I'd go for several 2-socket machines instead of > one 4-socket machine. > I do need 2 machines since I need an HA solution. So on top of those question I try to figure out if Slony-I can do the job in my scenario or do I need the Mammoth solution. I'm searching the list right now and there is not a lot of info... :-( Any Idea? So thanks for the info about the DL385 I will look deeply into it ! Best Regards /David > /Mikael > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org >> [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of David >> Gagnon >> Sent: den 3 juli 2006 13:42 >> To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org >> Subject: [PERFORM] Is postgresql ca do the job for software deployed >> > in > >> ASP ou SaaS mode? >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've been working on my personal project for 3.5 years now. I >> developed an ERP system in web/java. Now the people I will work with >> suggest to offers it in Saas mode. Which means my customer will >> > connect > >> to my website and found they ERP software and data there. It's not >> > the > >> deployment I planned initially so if you can just validate some >> technicals points to be sure it's not crazy using Postgresl here and >> > not > >> a big $$$ db to do the job. >> >> Typically I will have 1db per client and around 150 tables per db. So >> since I hope I didn`t work all those year for nothing .. I expect to >> have bunch of clients witch means the same amount of db since I have 1 >> db/client. >> >> Can I hope having several hundred of db on 1 db server? Like 250 dbs >> > = > >> 250 client = 360 000 tables !!! >> So is there a limit for the number of db in the db server ?(this spec >> > is > >> not on the website) What about the performance? Can I expect to have >> > the > >> same performance? >> >> Since I put everything on the web I do needs an High Availability >> infrastructure. I looked into SlonyI and Mammoth to replicate the db >> but since SlonyI use triggers can I expect it to do the job? Is >> > Mammoth > >> is the only available solution? >> >> Last question and not the least I'm reading this performance list for >> several years now and know suggestion about hardware to run postgresl >> > is > >> discussed. Since I wrote software there severals points about >> > hardware > >> that I don`t understand. Do you have any suggestion of platform to >> > run > >> into my Saas configuration? I do need the WISE one! I'm pretty sure >> that if I was a big company I would be able throw bunch of $$$$ but >> > it's > >> not my case. I'm pretty sure it exists out there some piece of >> > Hardware > >> that would do the job perfectly with a fair price. >> >> So far I did understand that Postgresql loves Opteron and I have >> > looked > >> into the dl145 series of HP. I did understand that Dell Hardware it`s >> not reliable. But it's still not clear what should be my requirement >> for memory, disk, nb cpu, cpu power, etc. >> >> I'm pretty sure it`s better to have more slower CPUs that having the >> latest Opteron available on the market, or more slower servers that >> having the fastest one... am I right? But agains what it`s the >> > optimal > >> choice? >> >> Thanks you to share your knowledge on those point. I do consider >> > using > >> Postgresql is the Smart choice in my project since the beginning but >> before putting all the money (That I don`t have ..:-)) to buy some >> hardware I just want to be sure I'm not crazy! >> >> Thanks for your help I really appreciate it!! >> >> Best Regards >> /David >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------(end of >> > broadcast)--------------------------- > >> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > >
pgsql-performance by date: