Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron Johnson
Subject Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 44A5DE81.8080309@cox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL  (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chris Browne wrote:
> ron.l.johnson@cox.net (Ron Johnson) writes:
>
>> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> However, the more interesting thing here, is that every
>>> statement, including DDL is transactable, except for a couple of
>>> big odd ones, like create database. So, in postgresql, you can do:
>>>
>>> begin;
>>> create table xyz...
>>> alter table abc...
>>> insert into abc select * from iii
>>> update iii...;
>>> drop table iii;
>>> (oops, I messed up something)
>>> rollback;
>> But isn't that what it means to be "transactional"?  Or am I spoiled
>>  by my "big, expensive enterprise database"?
>
> DDL commonly hasn't been "able to be rolled back," even in "big,
> expensive" databases...

I guess I'm just fortunate...

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA  USA

Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEpd6BS9HxQb37XmcRAgu8AKCqp6KxNYoa0tIcmbglG8XXSzgXpQCgjDLv
vYkFNzwXF1K+b9ZNK6Svr64=
=mW9L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql vs mysql
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Notes on converting from MySQL 5.0.x to PostgreSQL