> I won't have access to the original testcase and server for a few days
> but I just redid some testing on a slower personal box of mine with a
> smaller(but similiar) testset and on that box I could not reproduce that
> issue.
> So the problem is either caused by the size of the table or somehow by
> the data itself :-(
We tested gin with 5 millions records (but not a wikipedia's text, but with blog
records which is usually mush shorter) and index creation time was near 8 hours
on Dual Xeon 3.2, but we didn't try GiST. In other hand, creating GiST index on
0.5 millions emails took about 12 hours.
That's why 7 minutes is very suspicious result.
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
