Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Date
Msg-id 448E11B1.20309@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
Responses Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?  ("J. Andrew Rogers" <jrogers@neopolitan.com>)
List pgsql-performance
> Empirically... postgresql built for 64 bits is marginally slower than
> that built
> for a 32 bit api on sparc. None of my customers have found 64 bit x86
> systems to be suitable for production use, yet, so I've not tested on any
> of those architectures.

Really? All of our customers are migrating to Opteron and I have many
that have been using Opteron for over 12 months happily.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Cheers,
>   Steve
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>


--

             === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
       Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
       Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
                      http://www.commandprompt.com/



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?
Next
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards?