Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> Important as you are, "one swallow does not make a summer".
>>
>
> On the other hand, unless we want the lists filling up with a bunch of
> +1 posts, it's probably better to assume that unless someone objects a
> patch would be accepted.
>
What happened was that Tom objected to (or at least queried the need
for) the patch on the grounds that it was bloat that nobody had asked
for. And when I asked I wasn't exactly deluged with requests to commit,
so I concluded that it was not generally wanted. Since then I have had
probably 10 requests for it, so I am now going to work to update it and
will post a revised patch.
cheers
andrew
