Douglas McNaught wrote:
> Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> writes:
>
>> On May 9, 2006, at 11:51 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>> And dollar for dollar, SCSI will NOT be faster nor have the hard
>>> drive capacity that you will get with SATA.
>> Does this hold true still under heavy concurrent-write loads? I'm
>> preparing yet another big DB server and if SATA is a better option,
>> I'm all (elephant) ears.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've never heard of a 15kRPM SATA drive.
Best I have seen is 10k but if I can put 4x the number of drives in the
array at the same cost... I don't need 15k.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> -Doug
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
