Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
Date
Msg-id 444E7494.1040900@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
List pgsql-performance
> But don't believe me or the other people who've seen the difference.  Go
> buy the Intel box.  No skin off my back.

To be more detailed... AMD Opteron has some specific technical
advantages to their design over Intel when it comes to peforming for a
database. Specifically no front side bus :)

Also it is widely known and documented (just review the archives) that
AMD performs better then the equivelant Intel CPU, dollar for dollar.

Lastly it is also known that Dell frankly, sucks for PostgreSQL. Again,
check the archives.

Joshua D. Drake


--

            === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
      Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
      Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
                     http://www.commandprompt.com/



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Sriram Dandapani"
Date:
Subject: Re: planner not using index for like operator
Next
From: Florian Weimer
Date:
Subject: Re: ip address data type