Re: GiST index slower than seqscan - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Teodor Sigaev
Subject Re: GiST index slower than seqscan
Date
Msg-id 4448E439.2010900@sigaev.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GiST index slower than seqscan  (CG <cgg007@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-general

> When I said full text, I meant substring. Please correct me if I am wrong, but
> tsearch would be useful for finding words in a paragraph, not characters in a
> word (or small group of words) ... If I had fields 'Hello World!', 'Low Tide',
> and 'Following Day' they would all be hits for a search on 'low' ...
>

Ok, I see

> I bet you meant ltree/ltree.h ... I'll give that a try and see what happens!
> Thank you!

Ltree index structure is mixed by BTree and signature tree. You don't need Btree
part as I understand...

I don't know efficient index structure to support queries you want... May be
Oleg knows...


--
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
                                                    WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: setting the environment locale - linux, windows
Next
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: A few questions about ltree