Re: [Slony1-general] Is a high tab_reloid worrying? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John Sidney-Woollett
Subject Re: [Slony1-general] Is a high tab_reloid worrying?
Date
Msg-id 443E25A3.7040301@wardbrook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Slony1-general] Is a high tab_reloid worrying?  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>)
Responses Re: [Slony1-general] Is a high tab_reloid worrying?  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-general
My tables are defined "WITHOUT OID" - does that make a difference?

John

Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, N, 2006-04-13 kell 10:06, kirjutas John
> Sidney-Woollett:
>
>>I just added a new table to a slony relication set. The new table seems
>>to have a really high tab_reloid value of 94,198,669
>
> ...
>
>>Is this something I should be worried about? Can I find out where all
>>the intermediate OIDs have gone?
>
>
> probably to data rows, unless you have all your tables defined using
> WITHOUT OID. OIDs are assigned from a global "sequence".
>
> --------
> Hannu
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>                http://archives.postgresql.org

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "hubert depesz lubaczewski"
Date:
Subject: corrupted item pointer:???
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: corrupted item pointer:???