Re: Hardware related question: 3ware 9500S - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Geoffrey
Subject Re: Hardware related question: 3ware 9500S
Date
Msg-id 443D513F.3040507@3times25.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hardware related question: 3ware 9500S  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-general
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:53:01PM -0400, Ted Byers wrote:
>> I take it that "RAID 1+0" refers to a combination of Raid 1 and RAID 0.
>> What about RAID 10?  I am curious because RAID 10 has come out since the
>> last time I took a look at RAID technology.  I am not sure what it actually
>> does differently from RAID 5.
>
> AIUI, RAID 10 = RAID 1+0. Lame, I know. Similarly, some people have
> invented RAID 50 = RAID 5+0.
>
> Not sure if that's the official definition though, but that's the way
> I've seen it used.

Useful info on RAID definitions:

http://tinyurl.com/zhnmc

--
Until later, Geoffrey

Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little
security will deserve neither and lose both.  - Benjamin Franklin

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware related question: 3ware 9500S
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware related question: 3ware 9500S