Re: serious problems with vacuuming databases - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: serious problems with vacuuming databases
Date
Msg-id 44397071.80008@fuzzy.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: serious problems with vacuuming databases  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: serious problems with vacuuming databases
Re: serious problems with vacuuming databases
List pgsql-performance
> Probably the indexes are bloated after the vacuum full.  I think the
> best way to get rid of the "fat" is to recreate both tables and indexes
> anew.  For this the best tool would be to CLUSTER the tables on some
> index, probably the primary key.  This will be much faster than
> VACUUMing the tables, and the indexes will be much smaller as result.

I guess you're right. I forgot to mention there are 12 composed indexes
on the largest (and not deleted) table B, having about 14.000.000 rows
and 1 GB of data. I'll try to dump/reload the database ...

t.v.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: serious problems with vacuuming databases
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: serious problems with vacuuming databases