Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>>> As far as the PR material goes, something like "advisory locks
>>> incorporated into core" would be OK, but don't make it sound like
>>> there was nothing there before ...
> Yes, although if I'm doing this for PR, I need to use language which is
> standard in the industry or I won't be understood. What about
> "high-concurrency pessimistic locking mechanism"?
"Advisory lock" *is* a standard term. The other sounds, well, mighty PR-ish.
regards, tom lane
