Re: Use XLOG_CONTROL_FILE macro everywhere? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Anton A. Melnikov
Subject Re: Use XLOG_CONTROL_FILE macro everywhere?
Date
Msg-id 4419f57e-8af5-425a-aa98-a2f921162d37@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Use XLOG_CONTROL_FILE macro everywhere?  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi!

On 05.04.2025 06:11, Fujii Masao wrote:
> 
> Thanks for checking! Barring any objections, I'll go ahead and commit the patch.
> 

As for me all is ok. Thanks!

>> Maybe extend this to perl tests since there are several hardcoded names too?
>> The patch attached tries to do this.
> 
> I had the same thought, i.e., we could use scan_server_header() to pull
> XLOG_CONTROL_FILE from xlog_internal.h and replace the hardcoded "global/pg_control"
> in the TAP tests. But for now, that feels like overkill, since the TAP tests already
> have other hardcoded values like the WAL directory (pg_wal), and we haven't used
> macros like XLOGDIR there either. Replacing just "global/pg_control" might feel
> inconsistent, and handling the other cases properly would take more time beyond
> feature freeze. So I'm thinking it's better to use XLOG_CONTROL_FILE only in
> C code for now.

Agreed. Also think that it is better to fix all such places at once and some later.


Best wishes!

-- 
Anton A. Melnikov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Srirama Kucherlapati
Date:
Subject: RE: AIX support
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Back-patch of: avoid multiple hard links to same WAL file after a crash