Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf .... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
Date
Msg-id 44035EC8.6040507@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....  ("Mark Woodward" <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Maybe I'm too used to working in engineering groups. I am trying to get
> input for a project. Trying to iron out what the feature set should be and
> the objectives that should be attained. BEFORE I start coding.
>
>   
Well that is always a good idea but:

> Just saying "submit a patch" is the antithesis to good engineering, it
> works for hacking, but if I am going to develop a feature, I wish to do it
> right and have it appeal to the broadest possible audience, collect as
> much input about the needs of users, etc.
>   
The problem you are having is that sense many people do not see a 
benefit it is hard
to garner the feedback, thus the fallback to submit a patch.

If you submit a patch there is a chance that people will see the benefit 
within a simple
implementation and THEN you get the feedback you want.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mark Woodward"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_config, pg_service.conf, postgresql.conf ....
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: constraints and sql92 information_schema compliance