Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables)
Date
Msg-id 43fc11aa-027b-fc6b-150f-97f9c09e01f6@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 08/24/2016 12:20 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-08-23 19:18:04 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:11 PM, Tomas Vondra
>> <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> Could someone please explain how the unlogged tables are supposed to fix the
>>> catalog bloat problem, as stated in the initial patch submission? We'd still
>>> need to insert/delete the catalog rows when creating/dropping the temporary
>>> tables, causing the bloat. Or is there something I'm missing?
>
> Beats me.
>

Are you puzzled just like me, or are you puzzled why I'm puzzled?



-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange result with LATERAL query
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables)