Re: [HACKERS] additional contrib test suites - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] additional contrib test suites
Date
Msg-id 43e8f69c-e8c5-d57f-1c77-1ca76ed1b6fb@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] additional contrib test suites  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/18/17 09:54, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/16/17 08:10, David Steele wrote:
>>>> (5) drop contrib/chkpass altogether, on the grounds that it's too badly
>>>> designed, and too obsolete crypto-wise, to be useful or supportable.
>>> crypt() uses the 7 lowest characters, which makes for 7.2e16 values,
>>> so I would be fine with (5), then (4) as the test suite is not
>>> portable.
>> I'd prefer 5, but can go with 4.
>>
>> I get that users need to store their own passwords, but we have support
>> for SHA1 via the crypto module which seems by far the better choice.
> 
> I'm also tempted to just remove it.  It uses bad/outdated security
> practices and it's also not ideal as an example module.  Any objections?

Hearing none, thus removed.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 10RC1 crash testing MultiXact oddity
Next
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands