Re: Strange Create Index behaviour - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Gary Doades
Subject Re: Strange Create Index behaviour
Date
Msg-id 43F398F3.30105@gpdnet.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Strange Create Index behaviour  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
Tom Lane wrote:
> shared_buffers is unlikely to impact index build time noticeably in
> recent PG releases.  maintenance_work_mem would affect it a lot, though.
> What setting were you using for that?
>

Also, i tried upping maintenance_work_mem to 65536 and it didn't make
much difference (maybe 10% faster for the "normal" cases). Upping the
shared_buffers *definitely* makes the bad cases worse though, but I
agree I don't see why...

Regards,
Gary.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Gary Doades
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange Create Index behaviour
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange Create Index behaviour