Josh Berkus wrote:
> Mark,
>
>> Even though they run on the same machine, run the same version of the
>> software, and are used by the same applications, they have NO
>> interoperability. For now, lets just accept that they need to be on
>> separate physical clusters because some need to be able to started and
>> stopped while others need to remain running, there are other reasons,
>> but one reason will suffice for the discussion.
>
> For an immediate solution to what you are encountering, have you looked at
> pgPool?
I agree with Josh - pgpool sounds like the place to start with this.
That's got to be the easiest place to add some sort of "listall"/"switch
todb" functionality. It also means you're not *forced* to have only one
version of PG, or have them all on the same machine.
-- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
