Mark Woodward wrote:
>>"Mark Woodward" <pgsql@mohawksoft.com> writes:
>>
>>>One of the problems with the current PostgreSQL design is that all the
>>>databases operated by one postmaster server process are interlinked at
>>>some core level. They all share the same system tables. If one database
>>>becomes corrupt because of disk or something, the whole cluster is
>>>affected.
>>
>>This problem is not as large as you paint it, because most of the system
>>catalogs are *not* shared.
>>
>>
>>>Does anyone see this as useful?
>
>
> Seriously? No use at all? You don't see any purpose in controlling and
> managing multiple postgresql postmaster processes from one central point?
pgAdmin does so. IMHO it's totally sufficient to handle this on a client
side level.
Regards,
Andreas
