Hi, Marc,
Marc Morin wrote:
> 1- long running report is running on view
> 2- continuous inserters into view into a table via a rule
> 3- truncate or rule change occurs, taking an exclusive lock.
> Must wait for #1 to finish.
> 4- new reports and inserters must now wait for #3.
> 5- now everyone is waiting for a single query in #1. Results
> in loss of insert data granularity (important for our application).
Apart from having two separate views (one for report, one for insert) as
Richard suggested:
If you have fixed times for #3, don't start any #1 that won't finish
before it's time for #3.
You could also use the LOCK command on an empty lock table at the
beginning of each #1 or #3 transaction to prevent #3 from getting the
view lock before #1 is finished.
HTH,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
