Re: Fedora + Yum + 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Richard Sydney-Smith
Subject Re: Fedora + Yum + 8.1
Date
Msg-id 43C2351D.7030803@ibisau.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fedora + Yum + 8.1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Fedora + Yum + 8.1  (Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
Thanks Tom. 8.1 has some very tempting features.... running it on the windows box ... ayah but I like the lazy days
approachof having yum do the updates so guess the FC4 box will have to await the release of FC5.<br /><br /> r<br /><br
/>Tom Lane wrote: <blockquote cite="mid27701.1136797461@sss.pgh.pa.us" type="cite"><pre wrap="">Richard Sydney-Smith <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"href="mailto:richard@ibisau.com"><richard@ibisau.com></a> writes: </pre><blockquote
type="cite"><prewrap="">I am running Fedora core 4 with nightly "yum" update. Presently it is 
 
not picking up version 8.1 as an upgrade.   </pre></blockquote><pre wrap=""> </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre
wrap="">1)If I wait will 8.1 get added to the "yummy" list   </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
 
Nope.  FC4 is locked to the PG 8.0.x release series.  This goes along
with Red Hat's normal approach to release engineering: upgrades do not
introduce any significant incompatibilities.

PG 8.1 is in Fedora Rawhide == FC5-to-be.
 </pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">2) If I add 8.1 via the RPMs will future releases be maintained by "yum" 
or do future upgrades have to continue to be done manually via RPM's   </pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">
You can forcibly install any version you like, but it won't be maintained
by the Red Hat/Fedora infrastructure if you do --- at that point it's
on your own head to update the package as needed.
        regards, tom lane



 </pre></blockquote>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Gevik"
Date:
Subject: Re: Unregister Windows Service pg_ctl error
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: programming in pgsql