Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alan Stange
Subject Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
Date
Msg-id 43A81CE0.7060805@rentec.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1  ("Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1
List pgsql-performance
Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> I guess it depends on what you term as your metric for measurement.
> If it is just one query execution time .. It may not be the best on
> UltraSPARC T1.
> But if you have more than 8 complex queries running simultaneously,
> UltraSPARC T1 can do well compared comparatively provided the
> application can scale also along with it.

I just want to clarify one issue here.   It's my understanding that the
8-core, 4 hardware thread (known as strands) system is seen as a 32 cpu
system by Solaris.

So, one could have up to 32 postgresql processes running in parallel on
the current systems (assuming the application can scale).

-- Alan

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: David Roussel
Date:
Subject: Re: 2 phase commit: performance implications?
Next
From: David Lang
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Ultrasparc T1