Re: Per-database search_path - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Per-database search_path
Date
Msg-id 4399.1159568136@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Per-database search_path  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Per-database search_path
List pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:41:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah.  ISTM the correct generalization is "per-user per-database
>> default GUC settings", which has nothing to do with superuserness.

> This sounds like a TODO for 8.3.  What wrinkles might this involve?

Probably rethink the rolconfig/datconfig representation.  Maybe it's
time for a separate catalog for the settings.

> Offhand, I'm thinking that it would touch the inheritance stuff that
> roles have.

No, it wouldn't, because defaults only apply at the instant of
connection, so there's no inheritance or SET ROLE to worry about.
Whatever role you log in as is what you get.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Per-database search_path
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: The enormous s->childXids problem