Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions
Date
Msg-id 438FA729.4070602@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-patches
> BTW, has anyone checked Command Prompt's Subversion repository?  It's a
> mirror of our anonymous CVS (AFAICT).  I'm using it for reading diffs
> lately, and it's much nicer to look at the whole patch as a single diff
> rather than going a single file at a time.
>
> http://projects.commandprompt.com/projects/public/pgsql/browser/trunk/pgsql
>
> It has the additional advantage over our current CVSweb that it's set
> with tabs to 4 spaces, so it looks just like our code is supposed to ...

Does anyone else find the PostgreSQL "TRUNK" funny? :D


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Qingqing Zhou"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fork-based version of pgbench
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?