Re: Bug in predicate indexes? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Bug in predicate indexes?
Date
Msg-id 43829129.3030003@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in predicate indexes?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> <(integer,bigint)
> <(bigint,integer)
> <(smallint,integer)
> <(integer,smallint)
> <(real,double precision)
> <(double precision,real)
> <(smallint,bigint)
> <(bigint,smallint)
> <(date,timestamp without time zone)
> <(date,timestamp with time zone)
> <(timestamp without time zone,date)
> <(timestamp with time zone,date)
> <(timestamp without time zone,timestamp with time zone)
> <(timestamp with time zone,timestamp without time zone)
>
>I'm not sure this is worth documenting given that it's likely to change
>by 8.2 anyway.
>  
>
I think that we should be explicit as possible. This is a limitation 
that effects every release
that is currently supported by the community. Which is as least 7.4, 
8.0, 8.1 and possibly
7.3 (did we ever come to conclusion on that?).

The limitation should be addressed and patched to each documentation set. 

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>            regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>  
>


-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: mark@mark.mielke.cc
Date:
Subject: Re: Are NULLs in Arrays compressed?
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Are NULLs in Arrays compressed?