Optimizer bug in 8.1.0? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Alexey Slynko |
---|---|
Subject | Optimizer bug in 8.1.0? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 437DDABA.5030105@tronet.ru Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Optimizer bug in 8.1.0?
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, I have database with two tables: test1=# \d messages Table "public.messages" Column | Type | Modifiers ----------+-----------+-----------msg_id | integer | not nullsections | integer[] | Indexes: "messages_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (msg_id) "messages_sect_idx" gist (sections gist__intbig_ops) and test1=# \d message_parts Table "public.message_parts" Column | Type | Modifiers -----------+----------+-----------msg_id | integer |index_fts | tsvector | Indexes: "a_gist_key" gist (index_fts) "message_parts_msg_id" btree (msg_id) Number of records are: test1=# SELECT count(*) from messages ;count -------41483 (1 row) and test1=# SELECT count(*) from message_parts ;count --------511136 (1 row) Then, try to execute query:test1=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * from messages m1, message_parts m2 where m1.msg_id = m2.msg_id and m1.sections @@ '300000210' and m2.index_fts @@ 'mar'; QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Nested Loop (cost=11.07..608.20 rows=1 width=481) (actual time=744.008..5144.721 rows=4 loops=1) -> Bitmap Heap Scan on messages m1 (cost=3.15..118.46 rows=41 width=38) (actual time=1.734..5.737 rows=348 loops=1) Filter: (sections @@ '300000210'::query_int) -> BitmapIndex Scan on messages_sect_idx (cost=0.00..3.15 rows=41 width=0) (actual time=1.655..1.655 rows=348 loops=1) Index Cond: (sections @@ '300000210'::query_int) -> Bitmap Heap Scan on message_parts m2 (cost=7.92..11.93 rows=1 width=443) (actual time=14.752..14.752 rows=0 loops=348) Recheck Cond: ("outer".msg_id = m2.msg_id) Filter:(index_fts @@ '''mar'''::tsquery) -> BitmapAnd (cost=7.92..7.92 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=14.743..14.743 rows=0 loops=348) -> Bitmap Index Scan on message_parts_msg_id (cost=0.00..2.88 rows=252 width=0) (actual time=0.026..0.026 rows=6 loops=348) Index Cond: ("outer".msg_id = m2.msg_id) -> Bitmap Index Scan on a_gist_key (cost=0.00..4.79 rows=511 width=0) (actual time=14.966..14.966 rows=1762 loops=342) Index Cond: (index_fts @@ '''mar'''::tsquery)Totalruntime: 5144.859 ms (14 rows) And if I turn enable_bitmapscan = off, then: test1=# SET enable_bitmapscan = off; test1=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * from messages m1, message_parts m2 where m1.msg_id = m2.msg_id and m1.sections @@ '300000210' and m2.index_fts @@ 'mar'; QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hash Join (cost=158.07..2128.36 rows=1 width=481) (actual time=65.873..203.738 rows=4 loops=1) Hash Cond: ("outer".msg_id = "inner".msg_id) -> Index Scan using a_gist_key on message_partsm2 (cost=0.00..1967.73 rows=511 width=443) (actual time=0.170..200.361 rows=481 loops=1) Index Cond: (index_fts @@ '''mar'''::tsquery) Filter: (index_fts @@ '''mar'''::tsquery) -> Hash (cost=157.96..157.96 rows=41 width=38) (actual time=2.489..2.489 rows=348 loops=1) -> Index Scan using messages_sect_idx on messages m1 (cost=0.00..157.96 rows=41 width=38) (actual time=0.052..2.020 rows=348 loops=1) Index Cond: (sections @@ '300000210'::query_int) Filter: (sections @@ '300000210'::query_int)Totalruntime: 203.857 ms (10 rows) Test suite can be found at http://www.pgsql.ru/optimizer_bug.tar.gz (WARNING: 22 MB) Any suggestions?
pgsql-hackers by date: