Re: Multi-table-unique-constraint - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Multi-table-unique-constraint
Date
Msg-id 437765E3.10808@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multi-table-unique-constraint  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Matt Newell <newellm@blur.com> writes:
>  
>
>>BTW, i'm on the list now, so no need to cc me.
>>    
>>
>
>Common practice around here is to cc people anyway --- this has grown
>out of a history of occasionally-slow list mail delivery.  If you don't
>want it, best to fix it in your mail filters rather than expecting
>people to change habits for you.
>
>
>  
>

You can also change your subscriptions so that you don't get a copy from 
the list if you are in the To: or Cc: lists. I find this is better then 
having to set up filters. Visit 
http://mail.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr/domain=postgresql.org

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] prepareThreshold=1 and statement.executeBatch() ??
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Supporting NULL elements in arrays