Re: generic builtin functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: generic builtin functions
Date
Msg-id 4373C925.7020009@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: generic builtin functions  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: generic builtin functions  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers

David Fetter wrote:

>On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:08:29PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>  
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I'm not convinced that using bigint-equivalent space for an enum is
>>>a mortal sin...
>>>      
>>>
>>at least venial ...
>>    
>>
>
>Heh.
>
>Would ORDER BY somehow know about enums' given ordering?
>
>
>  
>

ORDER BY (and all inequality operators) will reflect the defined 
enumeration ordering, as happens today with enumkit-defined types.

That is a fundamental requirement that I won't deviate from.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: generic builtin functions
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: generic builtin functions