On Fri, 2025-10-24 at 18:43 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> Unless char32_t is solely used for the Unicode code point data, I
> think it would be better to define something like "pg_unicode" and
> use
> it instead of directly using char32_t because it would be cleaner for
> code readers.
That was my original idea, but then I saw that apparently char32_t is
intended for Unicode code points:
https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/The-char32_005ft-type.html
But I am also OK with a new type if others find it more readable.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
