Re: Planner statistics vs. count(*) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Bricklen Anderson
Subject Re: Planner statistics vs. count(*)
Date
Msg-id 4330550B.80600@PresiNET.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Planner statistics vs. count(*)  (evgeny gridasov <eugrid@fpm.kubsu.ru>)
List pgsql-performance
evgeny gridasov wrote:
> Hi Everybody.
>
> I am going to replace some 'select count(*) from ... where ...' queries
> which run on large tables (10M+ rows) with something like
> 'explain select * from ... where ....' and parse planner output after that
> to find out its forecast about number of rows the query is going to retrieve.
>
> Since my users do not need exact row count for large tables, this will
> boost performance for my application. I ran some queries with explain and
> explain analyze then. If i set statistics number for the table about 200-300
> the planner forecast seems to be working very fine.
>
> My questions are:
> 1. Is there a way to interact with postgresql planner, other than 'explain ...'? An aggregate query like 'select
estimate_count(*)from ...' would really help =)) 
> 2. How precise is the planner row count forecast given for a complex query (select with 3-5 joint
tables,aggregates,subselects,etc...)? 
>
>
I think that this has been done before. Check the list archives (I believe it
may have been Michael Fuhr?)

ah, check this:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2005-08/msg00046.php

--
_______________________________

This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does
not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or
copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an
intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in
error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
_______________________________

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: evgeny gridasov
Date:
Subject: Planner statistics vs. count(*)
Next
From: Nelba Sánchez Rojas
Date:
Subject: unsubscribe