Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs
Date
Msg-id 43166A33.5@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs
List pgsql-hackers
> I really really do not like proposals to introduce still another kind
> of VACUUM.  We have too many already; any casual glance through the
> archives will show that most PG users don't have a grip on when to use
> VACUUM FULL vs VACUUM.  Throwing in some more types will make that
> problem exponentially worse.

Yes, but if they're all under the control of autovacuum, then users 
don't have to worry...

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples