Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Or, for something far easier, try
> http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgcluster/ which provides syncronous
> multi-master clustering.
>
He specifically said that pgcluster did not work for him because the
databases would be at physically seperate locations. PGCluster requires
that there be a load balancer and a replicator centrally located
managing the cluster. If a network problem happens at the centralized
location, it would bring down all locations completely.
I think he's looking for an async solution because of that. In my
solution, if one location goes down, the others keep going.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
