Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?
Date
Msg-id 430976ea-baaf-c478-361d-b6f4713b5bfa@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 4/25/17 15:42, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> Here is the patch doing just that.
> 
> And one more revision which also checks in_use when attaching shared
> memory. This is mainly to improve the user visible behavior in
> theoretical corner case when the worker is supposed to be cleaned up but
> actually still manages to start (it would still fail even without this
> change but the error message would be more obscure).

Committed that, with some editorializing.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix a typo in subscriptioncmd.c