Re: Windows + IP6 progress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Windows + IP6 progress
Date
Msg-id 430521FC.1000504@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows + IP6 progress  ("Chuck McDevitt" <cmcdevitt@greenplum.com>)
Responses Re: Windows + IP6 progress  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Chuck McDevitt wrote:

>I think it's because it's __stdcall, and the name gets mangled to
>include the number of parameters. 
>
>  
>

Aha! now it makes sense. How do we get around that in the configure tests?

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Chuck McDevitt"
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows + IP6 progress
Next
From: Djoerd Hiemstra
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL/XML extension