Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> I find the whole argument that, lack of an untrusted version of the PL
>> means it should be deprecated, crazy. There are plenty of situations
>> where you don't care that the PL is untrusted.
>
>
> Yes you are absolutely correct. However my argument was more than that.
Right.
I was responding to the entire thread that was headed in the direction
of saying that just because a language doe not have a trusted PL
version, it should be removed.
As others have said, I find myself using PL/pgSQL when I need trusted,
and frequently use other languages when I need untrusted. And in most of
my experience, I don't even care if the language is trusted or
untrusted. There are plenty of use cases for both.
Joe
