Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core
Date
Msg-id 4302EC35.2070204@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core
List pgsql-hackers
David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:17:27PM -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> 
>>I promise that the aggregate work required for all coders who know
>>Python to switch to ruby is far far greater than the work required
>>to fix the issues with pl/python. :)
> 
> Are you certain?  See above in re: what Guido had to say.
> 

I find the whole argument that, lack of an untrusted version of the PL 
means it should be deprecated, crazy. There are plenty of situations 
where you don't care that the PL is untrusted.

Joe



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing CONCURRENT VACUUM (Was: Release notes for
Next
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core