Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

RE: Why is parula failing? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tharakan, Robins
Subject RE: Why is parula failing?
Date
Msg-id 42a68c37debe4ac8b8ad82b537ec6b96@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why is parula failing?  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Why is parula failing?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi David / Tom,

> David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> It would be good to have log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0 on this machine for a while.

- Have set log_autovacuum_min_duration=0 on parula and a test run came out okay.
- Also added REL_16_STABLE to the branches being tested (in case it matters here).

Let me know if I can help with any other changes here.
-
Robins | tharar@ | adelaide@australia

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Lakhin
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE SET ACCESS METHOD on partitioned tables
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation