Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
Date
Msg-id 42FF709A.1050601@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
List pgsql-patches

Andreas Pflug wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>
>> I removed the separate pg_file_length() function, as it doesn't have any
>> significant notational advantage anymore; you can do
>
>
> Please note that there are pg_file_length functions in use for 8.0 on
> probably >95 % of win32 installations, so you're breaking backwards
> compatibility.
>
>

If the windows packagers have added extra functions into their build of
postgres, then they can maintain them, no? Of course, this would
illustrate the danger of such a practice.  Postgres is surely only
obligated to try not to break backwards compatibility with its own
released code.

cheers

andrew

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify issues with SPI and C language function limitations
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each