Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 16:01 +0100, Richard Huxton wrote:
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>>What if there aren't any "untouched chunks"? With only 64K-chunk
>>>granularity, I think you'd hit that condition a lot more than you are
>>>hoping. Also, this seems to assume uniqueness across all tables in an
>>>entire cluster, which is much more than we want; it makes the 32-bit
>>>size of OIDs significantly more worrisome than when they only need to be
>>>unique within a table.
>>
>>Can I ask what happens if we end up re-using a recently de-allocated
>>OID? Specifically, can a cached plan (e.g. plpgsql function) end up
>>referring to an object created after it was planned:
>>
>>CREATE FUNCTION f1()... -- oid=1234
>>CREATE FUNCTION f2()... -- oid=1235, calls f1() or oid=1234
>>DROP FUNCTION f1()
>>CREATE FUNCTION f3()... -- re-uses oid=1234
>
>
> Possible, but extremely unlikely... you'd have to keep a session open
> with a prepared query for as long as it takes to create a 4 billion
> tables... not a high priority case, eh?
Ah, but it does rule out the possibility of keeping a cache of "recently
de-allocated" OIDs and re-using those.
-- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
