Kevin Grittner wrote:
> To better support existing applications which (for reasons I don't
> really understand) rely on the vendor-specific errorCode instead of the
> ANSI-standard sqlState, you could implement getErrorCode as:
>
> return Integer.parseInt(getSqlState(), 36);
Ow! It seems a bit pointless though, honestly..
Going to wait for a reply from the original poster, I still don't
understand what Peter wants getErrorCode() to return..
-O
