Neil Conway wrote:
> Not at the moment. I believe we have agreed that it would be better to
> remove the concept of "exception variables" and just use strings, but I
> haven't implemented this yet.
BTW, one minor annoyance I noticed: a builtin condition name can
actually map to multiple SQLSTATE values. If we allow a builtin
condition name to be specified to RAISE, this means we'll actually need
to pass around a list of SQLSTATE values that are thrown by the RAISE,
rather than a single SQLSTATE. This seems pretty ugly, though --
especially considering that only a handful of the builtin condition
names actually do map to multiple SQLSTATEs. Does anyone have a better
suggestion?
-Neil
