Tom Lane wrote:
> I think this is all irrelevant language-lawyering; jtv spotted the true
> problem which is that we do not protect errno during the *first* call of
> libpq_gettext.
I think you're missing the point. Obviously the current code is wrong,
the debate is over the best way to fix it. Jeroen's interpretation of
the spec suggests that merely having libpq_gettext() preserve errno is
not sufficient. I'm not convinced this his interpretation is correct,
but it is a question worth resolving.
-Neil
