Josh Berkus wrote:
>Andrew,
>
>
>
>>If people don't monitor the buildfarm then it isn't serving its purpose
>>of catching these things quickly.
>>
>>
>
>Related to that , Spikesource has started their automated tests (which
>currently include JDBC, php and phpPgAdmin as well as PostgreSQL). They have
>a web services interface; I was thinking of writing a widget which would
>e-mail notices of failures. Maybe I should send them to your list so that
>it's all one digest?
>
>
>
Er, who?
What are they testing and how? How often?
I am expecting that for the most part people will want the lists of
state changes, rather than the lists of all builds or failures. Will
Spikesource tests track state changes?
BTW, these list are being set up only for announcements, so I would have
to grant permission before any results started flowing.
cheers
andrew
