Hi!
What about a ready solution such as apache cocoon or lenya? I think it
has quite a lot of advantages.
Josh Berkus wrote:
>Dave,
>
>
>
>>All the work is currently being done by people that know HTML so
>>initially that is all the support that is required, however in the
>>longterm this will definitely be useful.
>>
>>
>
>Well, that's certainly self-fulfilling.
>
>The reason why the number of PostgreSQL websites keeps expanding is partly
>because the main site is pretty useless to the majority of the community
>for sharing information. I know that I specifically stopped submitting
>stuff to Techdocs because I spend more time doing HTML markup than I did
>writing articles ... and that it was impossible to keeps stuff up to date
>because it's so hard to edit. And the Brazillian community members I
>talked to aren't interested in creating or utilizing a Brazillian version
>of the main site because it doesn't allow them to share information the
>way their wiki does.
>
>If you and Robert are happy being the sole content providers for
>PostgreSQL.org in perpetuity, then by all means don't use a CMS. But
>maybe you should recognize what you're doing.
>
>
>
--
Regards,
László Hornyák
