Re: Bug with view definition? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Sebastian Böck
Subject Re: Bug with view definition?
Date
Msg-id 42A715AE.60209@freenet.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug with view definition?  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Responses Re: Bug with view definition?  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
List pgsql-general
Richard Huxton wrote:
> Sebastian Böck wrote:
>
>>Hello all,
>>
>>why is the last definition of a view not working, although the
>>documentation says all three are equal?
>>
>
>
>>CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW not_working AS
>>    SELECT one.*
>>    FROM one.one, two.two
>>    JOIN join1 ON join1.id = one.id;
>
>
> I think it's trying to join "two" to "join1" - try
>    ...FROM two.two, one.one
>    JOIN join1...

Sure, but the problem still exists if you want to join with table one
and table two.

Forgot to say that this also applies for normal selects (of course!).

Sebastian


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: return two elements
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug with view definition?