Well, she implied with quoting my comment that "most developers were
unaware of EnterpriseDB's interaction with the community". I'd never
heard anything about you, so of course I said I didn't remember you
contacting the list. If that's all been private between EnterpriseDB
and some special developers, then it just makes me look stupid, doesn't it?
Andy Astor wrote:
> Regarding the eWeek article, Lisa Vaas's included several unfortunate
> inaccuracies, even after she updated it with my comments. Most important
> for this audience, though, is her implication that EnterpriseDB hasn't
> contacted the development team. As many of you know, we have been -- and
> are -- working with several community leaders/members to find the right
> ways to contribute. Much of that thought process was undercover until a
> couple of weeks ago, when we emerged from stealth, but will be much more
> public over the next couple of weeks. Stay tuned...
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-
>>owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Neil Conway
>>Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 11:44 PM
>>To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
>>Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] 2 articles
>>
>>I didn't see these posted here:
>>
>>http://www.pervasivepostgres.com/news/04282005.asp
>>
>
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1821359,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03129TX1K000
> 06
>
>>08
>>
>>-Neil
>>
>>---------------------------(end of
>
> broadcast)---------------------------
>
>>TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
