Re: NOLOGGING option, or ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
Date
Msg-id 429E3F61.8040003@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 10:35 -0700, Alon Goldshuv wrote:
>>2) A modified command syntax for introducing a direct single row error
>>handling. By direct I mean - a row that if rejected from within the COPY

>>5) allow an ERRORLIMIT to allow control of aborting a load after a certain
>>number of errors (and a pre-requisite for this is point number 2 above).

> 2) and 5) seem critical for combined usability & performance with real
> world data.

I'll second that! This would be a huge win for one of my real world 
applications, whether implemented as a new command, or as added 
capability on top of COPY. The other performance enhancements would 
certainly be nice to have also, but in my experience not nearly as 
important as these two.

Joe


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
Next
From: "Alon Goldshuv"
Date:
Subject: Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?