Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
Date
Msg-id 42804669-7063-1320-ed37-3226d5f1067d@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
List pgsql-hackers
On 17.08.23 04:50, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Yeah, this crossed my mind.  Do you know of any existing examples of
>> options with links to a common section?  One problem with this approach is
>> that there are small differences in the wording for some of the frontend
>> utilities, so it might be difficult to cleanly unite these sections.
> The closest thing I can think of is Color Support in section
> Appendixes, that describes something shared across a lot of binaries
> (that would be 6 tools with this patch).

I think it's a bit much to add a whole appendix for that little content.

We have a collection of platform-specific notes in chapter 19, including 
file-system-related notes in section 19.2.  Maybe it could be put there?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PGdocs] fix description for handling pf non-ASCII characters