Re: PL/java - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David Goodenough
Subject Re: PL/java
Date
Msg-id 4280243.LvFx2qVVIh@continuum
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/java  (Martin Gainty <mgainty@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-general

As of Java-16 there is a replacement for JNI which allows direct calling of native interfaces without the need for hand coded stub code.

On Monday, 7 December 2020 22:10:01 GMT Martin Gainty wrote:

> Nota Bene:

> Almost all official interfaces to/from Oracle are coded in Java

> FWIK google's implementations are 95% python

> (although you would need to understand JSON formatting for import/export

> requirements) for those reasons i tread lightly before disparaging either

> language

>

> Going Forward:

> try to implement PL/SQL that rob/joshua mentioned

> if you're calling no-joy after implementing PL/SQL

> then we can take a look at interfacing to Postgres ETL binaries with a JNI

> interface provided the JNI is spot on with signatures for each referenced

> function

>

> Un Saludo

> m

>

> ________________________________

> From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>

> Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 11:16 AM

> To: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>

> Subject: Re: PL/java

>

> On 12/7/20 8:25 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:

> > On 12/7/20 7:18 AM, Hemil Ruparel wrote:

> >> I want to say this. I never liked any extension language. It's like

> >> Java is not meant to interact with databases.

> >

> > The JDBC folks might disagree.

>

> That interaction is strictly sql to db, data to app.  As it should be.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Aravindhan Krishnan
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres-10 with FIPS
Next
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/java