Re: Inline PL/pgSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Inline PL/pgSQL
Date
Msg-id 427FA4C3.4080107@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Inline PL/pgSQL  ("Jonah H. Harris" <jharris@tvi.edu>)
Responses Re: Inline PL/pgSQL  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> 
> As for implementation, I think it would obviously be best to leave 
> plpgsql on its own as a PL but maybe change BEGIN and DECLARE in the 
> normal parser and have the system generate/execute a function on the 
> fly.  Or, maybe it would be better to integrate plpgsql.  Or, I may just 
> be crazy.
> 
> Would anyone else ever benefit from inline functions?

Well I could see inline functions being useful for debugging a function 
during development but I don't think I would want a bunch of plPGSQL 
mucking up my pretty SQL :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake




-- 
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Inline PL/pgSQL
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Inline PL/pgSQL